The Month of Confusion

To be really honest, I'm tired of the LGBTQA . . . more letters soon to follow . . .  Not only is this agenda gaining momentum at an astronomical rate, but I see those opposed actually helping it gain traction.  We need to stop and think about this for a moment.  When a vehicle gets stuck in a rut or mud or whatever, something abrasive against it, is what actually helps it get back on the road and moving.  Perhaps it's time to get the Scriptural heterosexual movement going forward instead of against the gay agenda.

We know what the rainbow stands for and means.  No agenda can claim or redefine what YHWH has spoken.

I read about this man some time back, but I found his website and, of course, he's surrounded in controversy, but his message is powerful.  Walt Heyer was sure he was "supposed" to be a woman.  He was sure he was a woman trapped in a man's body, so he sought surgical resolution.  He, sadly discovered later, that external changes do not change the DNA with which one is created.

He now lives his life as surgically mutilated man, a eunuch; and he's not the only one.  He's trying to get the message out!

http://www.sexchangeregret.com/wwwsexchangeregretcom

Confusion

I do not regularly subscribe to this magazine, but the term "transgender" caught my eye, not to mention the "Washington National Cathedral."  Apparently June is gay pride month, world wide.  I must have missed the memo.  At any rate, after reading the article, I Googled transgender and the search page itself comes with a rainbowed banner.  I'm really getting a bit tired of the bullying, and well theft . . . The rainbow was already a recognized symbol!  The same book that speaks quite negatively about all sorts of sexual sin, records a wonderful meaning of the rainbow.

Now, as to my Google search, I went to Wikipedia   As I read, I realized two things.  The definition of the term was a lot of confusion, but there was something else . . . The information repeatedly referred to one's "assigned sex."  The article leads one to believe that at birth, our sex is assigned.  No wonder there is so much "gender confusion" in this world!  I'm not claiming to be an expert on the subject, but I do know, at birth, there is no assignment.  Back in the old days before sonograms, the sex of the baby was not known until birth, but they arrived already assigned.  It was simply a matter of recognizing.

Years ago, I remember in an anatomy class learning that there is a day in which our sex is determined or assigned.  It's the 40th day of gestation.  Our Creator places a great deal of emphasis on the number 40 and it's not at the discretion of humanity to redefine or reassign.

So G-d created man in his own image, in the image of G-d created he him; male and female created he them.  Genesis 1
Here's the deal.  You can be a male that isn't attracted to females and you can be a female that isn't attracted to males.  You can even be a male that doesn't feel masculine and you can be a female that doesn't feel feminine, but you were still created, one or the other!

Headline Propaganda

Headlines are often startling for a reason, and images intensify the message.  It used to be, the headlines gave an inkling as to what was contained in the actual news article, when "the news" contained the reported facts and event.  Now, we are for the most part aware that the news is actually used to "lead one's thinking."  The link below proves our media is a part of the programing, rather than a source of information.

Two armed individuals, husband and wife, shot and killed two police officers at point blank range, then entered a Wal-Mart and the husband fired a round.  When an armed citizen confronted the shooter, his wife gunned down the citizen.  As the situation unfolded, the two headed to the back of the store preparing for a shootout with police.  Ultimately the wife shot her husband, then turned the weapon on herself and fired.

The local news now has the audacity to introduce the situation of a few months back on the Bundy ranch, into the article about the shooters, looking for ties that probably don't exist and if they do, they certainly have nothing to do with the Bundys.  Intentionally leading readers to tie this event to the BLM invasion of the Bundy ranch is irresponsible journalism.  There has not been proper time to investigate this matter.

Entering the url that states "probe ties between . . ." will obviously become a part of the digital history of the internet, and for those who still do not realize the the media is an arm of the powers that be, the connection will be drawn in the court of public opinion.  To make an unmitigated suggestion such as this, would be tantamount to claiming these mass shootings are staged and reported to sway the public in favor of gun control and confiscation.

Good reporting presents the facts discovered as a result of investigative journalism.  A news report is information regarding an event that has taken place, not programing to lead or mislead the readers and viewers to a chosen conclusion.

http://www.ktvn.com/story/25724967/police-probe-ties-between-vegas-shooters-bundy