No Free Lunch

The link below leads to an article that offers what appears to be a solid solution to a growing problem, but I perceive otherwise.  The child featured in this article is already on the federally funded lunch program, yet he was denied lunch.  The child said the lunch lady told him, ‘Guess what, you can’t have a lunch.’  The individual who spoke in this manner to an elementary aged child in front of classmates should not be working with children.  The "solution" proposed in many cities is to simply provide meals for all the children, regardless of income.  It seems those who fall outside of income eligibility limits could be covered, but the truth of the matter is, THERE IS NO FREE LUNCH.  The school system has become nothing more than an institution to program our youth.  The federal government has already mandated changes in the school lunches, as well as becoming prohibitive for children to bring lunch from home.  

Giving more power to a system which openly bullies children and takes their lunches from them, is not a reasonable answer to the problem!

http://thinkprogress.org/education/2014/11/22/3596022/school-lunch-denied/

Daylight Robbery

I found this post to be amazingly simple and profoundly insightful.  Just wanted to share


Last night my husband and I were talking to our daughter-in-law. My husband asked her, "What is your main reason for homeschooling? 

"I don't want to be robbed of the time I can spend with my children," she replied. And that's a lot of hours! During the twelve years of a child's schooling ( before they even go away to college), they will be away from home for SIX full years of their life! And that's not counting day care or traveling on the school bus. And this in the most FORMATIVE YEARS of their life!

Isn't it amazing how easily we become victims to a system? We do things just because that's what everyone does. We don't take time to evaluate whether it is the best way or not.

God doesn't give us children to give away to someone else to influence them in a humanist/liberal path. He gives them to us to fill them the Word of God and steer them into the ways of God. We have the responsibility to raise them to be young men and women of strength, dignity, purpose, integrity, justice, wisdom, and righteousness. We have the power to determine the destiny of the nation.

Don't let Satan rob you of the time, the anointing, the power, and the authority God has given to you as a mother.

Blessings from Nancy Campbell

The Battle Continues

In a recent talk at Liberty University, Cameron associated criticisms on the pagan origins of holidays to Chinese food, using sarcasm to mock those who would object to celebrating over pagan concerns. Cameron ended the talk by stating that the earth is the Lord’s and everything it contains, everything God created is sacred, and the whole earth belongs to Him, implying that Christians are allowed to enjoy worldly traditions.

Wordweb's definition of Sacred:  Made or declared or believed to be holy; devoted to a deity or some religious ceremony or use 

Gendron, however, counters Cameron’s stance: “Kirk needs to realize that Satan attempts led people astray from a sincere and pure devotion to Christ which is what Halloween has done (2 Cor. 11:3) For him to encourage people to have a little fun by taking part in the unfruitful works of darkness is not honoring to God or pleasing to the Lord Jesus Christ (Eph. 5:11).” 

Let's set aside tradition, sarcasm, and Chinese food for a moment and just address the notion that everything created is sacred.  We can all agree that trees are created.  The Garden of Eden was specifically created, detail by detail, yet everything in it was not "sacred."  The tree of knowledge of good and evil springs to mind!  Eating the fruit of that tree was specifically NOT a sacred thing to do!

Full article:  http://christiannews.net/2014/10/31/kirk-cameron-called-to-repent-for-encouraging-christians-to-celebrate-halloween/

Not Surprising

I'm truly offended that now that Muslim students want to pray, the system doesn't have a problem with students organizing their own religious gatherings . . .

The following is a quote from the article linked below.
Alex Luchenitser is an Associate Legal Director with Americans United for the Separation of Church and State. He says,"The separation of church and state prohibits schools from promoting religion. This probably does not present any constitutional problem as long as the same accommodation would be given to any other religion."

http://www.kvoa.com/news/n4t-investigators-church-and-state-98583/
Now, when it was Christians trying to gather, that was not the case and most of American society is clueless as to any Jewish prayers.  I remember clear back in my school days when the Bible Club tried to have prayer for lunch.  We were told we could not be accommodated for that specific time, because it was not a school sponsored activity.  It could not be a school sponsored activity because of the separation of church and state.  If I remember correctly, we were allowed to use a classroom after school, for a time, but that rule changed also.  That's been 40 years ago, so this has been in the works for some time.

So I read a headline that says a little boy was not allowed to read his Bible to himself, in free reading time, but Muslim children are afforded time out of class to pray . . . Where is the uproar from the group of "separation of church and state?"

BEFORE Transcript

The entire nation of Israel is about the same size as the state of New Jersey.  That's what all the fighting is about!  The Palestinians were handed Gaza and the West Bank in 2005.  I was in Israel in 2004, so I saw what would be handed over, lock, stock and barrel . . . Israel gave them lush green houses, olive groves, pomegranate orchards, stopped settlements in the West Bank, and handed the Palestinians the keys, so to speak.  There is no "Occupation" and hasn't been.  The so-called Palestinians were actually citizens of Israel, and have been since 1948.  They insisted upon their own leadership and split over that too.  Israel continues to hold the deed on the Judean Desert.

What I found and attempted to point out in this week's video can be shared by this simple link.  The comparison of the land at stake and the size of the Arab nations surrounding Israel gives clear indication this is not at all about giving land to the Palestinians.  This is about the annihilation of Israel.

Although the exact population has undoubtedly changed, this uproar amounts to basically a portion of New Jersey's population saying, we want a new state, all of our own, but we want it out of New Jersey, as a matter of fact, we want Trenton in the deal as well, and the other people in New Jersey can't go to Trenton unless we say they can.  Then, take this one step further, in comparing the size of the Arab nations to this tiny, tiny little sliver in the Middle East, called Israel.  Doesn't it make you wonder, if this isn't about the destruction of Israel; why the Arab nations don't want any Palestinian refugees?  I'm guessing one view of Gaza would be a good indicator of the lack of motivation and progress, that the rest of the Arab nations don't want to contend with.

The link below gives a number of fascinating details regarding land, space, and population.
 http://barrywingfield.com/2012/05/29/how-big-is-israel-compared-to-the-us-and-other-factual-questions-about-modern-israel/

The Month of Confusion

To be really honest, I'm tired of the LGBTQA . . . more letters soon to follow . . .  Not only is this agenda gaining momentum at an astronomical rate, but I see those opposed actually helping it gain traction.  We need to stop and think about this for a moment.  When a vehicle gets stuck in a rut or mud or whatever, something abrasive against it, is what actually helps it get back on the road and moving.  Perhaps it's time to get the Scriptural heterosexual movement going forward instead of against the gay agenda.

We know what the rainbow stands for and means.  No agenda can claim or redefine what YHWH has spoken.

I read about this man some time back, but I found his website and, of course, he's surrounded in controversy, but his message is powerful.  Walt Heyer was sure he was "supposed" to be a woman.  He was sure he was a woman trapped in a man's body, so he sought surgical resolution.  He, sadly discovered later, that external changes do not change the DNA with which one is created.

He now lives his life as surgically mutilated man, a eunuch; and he's not the only one.  He's trying to get the message out!

http://www.sexchangeregret.com/wwwsexchangeregretcom

Confusion

I do not regularly subscribe to this magazine, but the term "transgender" caught my eye, not to mention the "Washington National Cathedral."  Apparently June is gay pride month, world wide.  I must have missed the memo.  At any rate, after reading the article, I Googled transgender and the search page itself comes with a rainbowed banner.  I'm really getting a bit tired of the bullying, and well theft . . . The rainbow was already a recognized symbol!  The same book that speaks quite negatively about all sorts of sexual sin, records a wonderful meaning of the rainbow.

Now, as to my Google search, I went to Wikipedia   As I read, I realized two things.  The definition of the term was a lot of confusion, but there was something else . . . The information repeatedly referred to one's "assigned sex."  The article leads one to believe that at birth, our sex is assigned.  No wonder there is so much "gender confusion" in this world!  I'm not claiming to be an expert on the subject, but I do know, at birth, there is no assignment.  Back in the old days before sonograms, the sex of the baby was not known until birth, but they arrived already assigned.  It was simply a matter of recognizing.

Years ago, I remember in an anatomy class learning that there is a day in which our sex is determined or assigned.  It's the 40th day of gestation.  Our Creator places a great deal of emphasis on the number 40 and it's not at the discretion of humanity to redefine or reassign.

So G-d created man in his own image, in the image of G-d created he him; male and female created he them.  Genesis 1
Here's the deal.  You can be a male that isn't attracted to females and you can be a female that isn't attracted to males.  You can even be a male that doesn't feel masculine and you can be a female that doesn't feel feminine, but you were still created, one or the other!

Headline Propaganda

Headlines are often startling for a reason, and images intensify the message.  It used to be, the headlines gave an inkling as to what was contained in the actual news article, when "the news" contained the reported facts and event.  Now, we are for the most part aware that the news is actually used to "lead one's thinking."  The link below proves our media is a part of the programing, rather than a source of information.

Two armed individuals, husband and wife, shot and killed two police officers at point blank range, then entered a Wal-Mart and the husband fired a round.  When an armed citizen confronted the shooter, his wife gunned down the citizen.  As the situation unfolded, the two headed to the back of the store preparing for a shootout with police.  Ultimately the wife shot her husband, then turned the weapon on herself and fired.

The local news now has the audacity to introduce the situation of a few months back on the Bundy ranch, into the article about the shooters, looking for ties that probably don't exist and if they do, they certainly have nothing to do with the Bundys.  Intentionally leading readers to tie this event to the BLM invasion of the Bundy ranch is irresponsible journalism.  There has not been proper time to investigate this matter.

Entering the url that states "probe ties between . . ." will obviously become a part of the digital history of the internet, and for those who still do not realize the the media is an arm of the powers that be, the connection will be drawn in the court of public opinion.  To make an unmitigated suggestion such as this, would be tantamount to claiming these mass shootings are staged and reported to sway the public in favor of gun control and confiscation.

Good reporting presents the facts discovered as a result of investigative journalism.  A news report is information regarding an event that has taken place, not programing to lead or mislead the readers and viewers to a chosen conclusion.

http://www.ktvn.com/story/25724967/police-probe-ties-between-vegas-shooters-bundy

Political Party Difference

I used to credit the right wing for seeming rather locksteppy in their bootstrappiness, as that party never seemed terribly creative or innovative, for that matter.  They always seemed rather exclusive unto their own . . . These last few years, though, I've discovered those who I thought were creative and artistic and rather free thinking to be joining in lockstep.  When I saw this on a wall of social media, I just cut and pasted what appears in blue.  I've not changed a word. 

 You will note the political difference, this party is not locksteppy, like the other party . . . they are "lockarmy!"

______________________________________________________________

Sync the message. Stay focused. Lock arms and say it strong.

We are for the ACA.
We are for Women’s rights.
We are for Latino & Black people’s rights.
We are for strengthening voters rights, not taking them away.
We are for the increase in the minimum wage
We are for making corporations pay their fare share of taxes
We are for repealing Citizen’s United
We are against the gaming of the system by corporate interests.
We are for uncovering the off shore accounts and making those people pay taxes
We are against asset forfeiture.
We are for legalization because we are tired of feeding the endless beast of for profit prison systems.
We are for keeping religion out of government.
We want to keep creationism out of schools.

We are democrats we won’t apologize for it and are in fact proud of it. Credit goes to Astorix on Politicus USA

_____________________________________________________________

It's All in How You View It

TWO COWS ~{Matthias Varga}

SOCIALISM
You have 2 cows.
You give one to your neighbour

COMMUNISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and gives you some milk

FASCISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and sells you some milk

NAZISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both and shoots you

BUREAUCRATISM
You have 2 cows.
The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then
throws the milk away

TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM
You have two cows.
You sell one and buy a bull.
Your herd multiplies, and the economy
grows.
You sell them and retire on the income

ROYAL BANK OF SCOTLAND (VENTURE) CAPITALISM
You have two cows.
You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by
your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption
for five cows.
The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company.
The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. You sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States , leaving you with nine cows. No balance sheet provided with the release.
The public then buys your bull.

SURREALISM
You have two giraffes.
The government requires you to take harmonica lessons.

AN AMERICAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You sell one, and force the other to
produce the milk of four cows.
Later, you hire a consultant to analyse why
the cow has dropped dead.

A GREEK CORPORATION
You have two cows. You borrow lots of euros to build barns, milking sheds, hay stores, feed sheds,
dairies, cold stores, abattoir, cheese unit and packing sheds.
You still only have two cows.

A FRENCH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You go on strike, organise a riot, and block the roads, because you want three
cows.

A JAPANESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce
twenty times the milk.
You then create a clever cow cartoon image called a Cowkimona and
market it worldwide.

AN ITALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows,
but you don't know where they are.
You decide to have lunch.

A SWISS CORPORATION
You have 5000 cows. None of them belong to you.
You charge the owners for storing them.

A CHINESE CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You have 300 people milking them.
You claim that you have full employment, and high bovine productivity.
You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation.

AN INDIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
You worship them.

A BRITISH CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Both are mad.

AN IRAQI CORPORATION
Everyone thinks you have lots of cows.
You tell them that you have none.
No-one believes you, so they bomb the ** out of you and invade your country.
You still have no cows, but at least you are now a Democracy.

AN AUSTRALIAN CORPORATION
You have two cows.
Business seems pretty good.
You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.

A NEW ZEALAND CORPORATION
You have two cows.
The one on the left looks very attractive...

Missouri Outdoes Itself

When I heard of the outrageous hike in the cost of propane and the rationing, I was sad and ashamed of my state.

http://www.koamtv.com/story/24544586/recent-increases-in-propane-prices-raise-concern


Then when I read about the new stun cuffs, I was simply mortified.  Keep in mind, America, I heard it from a former Chief of Police himself, this city is the model city for the nation . . .  Telling a prisoner before you do it, is hardly giving them a choice.  Oh, I know, many will say, the prisoner has a choice in their behavior . . .  Regardless of what transpires, we know whose word will be accepted for the record.

http://www.sott.net/article/266818-Missouri-cops-now-using-80000-volt-stun-cuffs-on-prisoners